A Secret Weapon For difference between executive and non executive directors case laws

A Secret Weapon For difference between executive and non executive directors case laws

Blog Article

Just a few years in the past, searching for case precedent was a tough and time consuming endeavor, requiring people to search through print copies of case regulation, or to pay for access to commercial online databases. Today, the internet has opened up a bunch of case legislation search choices, and many sources offer free access to case regulation.

fourteen. Inside the light on the position explained previously mentioned, it can be concluded that a civil servant provides a fundamental right to get promoted even after his retirement by awarding proforma promotion; provided, his right of promotion accrued during his service but could not be deemed for no fault of his personal and meanwhile he retired on attaining the age of superannuation without any shortcoming on his part about deficiency within the length of service or within the form of inquiry and departmental action was so taken against his right of promotion. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 269 Order Date: 24-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

Case law is specific towards the jurisdiction in which it was rendered. As an example, a ruling in a very California appellate court would not commonly be used in deciding a case in Oklahoma.

To report technical problems with our Website, please contact the webmaster. The webmaster will not respond to inquiries seeking legal suggestions or specific cases. Questions regarding specific cases should be directed on the court in which the case has been or will be filed.

R.O, Office, Gujranwala and also the police officials did not inform him that the identification parade on the accused hasn't been conducted nonetheless. In the moment case, now the accused attempted to acquire advantage of the program aired by SAMAA News, wherein the image of the petitioner was widely circulated. The police should not have exposed the identity on the accused through electronic media. The law lends assurance to your accused that the identity should not be exposed to the witnesses, particularly for the witness to recognize the accused before the Magistrate. The C.P.O, Gujranwala present in court, stated that the Investigating Officer set a mask over the accused to conceal their identity and produced photographs. Aside from, the images shown to the media expose that a mask was not placed over the accused to hide his identity right until he was place up for an identification parade. Making images from the accused publically, either by showing the same to your witness or by publicizing the same in any newspaper or method, would create doubt within the proceedings on the identification parade. The Investigating Officer has to ensure that there is not any chance for your witness to begin to see the accused before going into the identification parade. The accused should not be shown into the witness in person or through any other mode, i.e., photograph, video-graph, or perhaps the press or electronic media. Given the reasons elaborated over, the case against the petitioner needs further probe and inquiry within the meanings of Section 497(2), Cr.P.C.

Article 27 from the Constitution does not only safeguard against discrimination within the time of appointment of service but after the appointment at the same time. The disparity in the fork out scale allowances of Stenographers during the District Judiciary is from the very clear negation of your legislation laid down through the Supreme Court in its many pronouncements. Read more

Retribution: Section 302 PPC also serves the purpose of retribution, where society seeks justice for the loss of the life. It allows the legal system to impose a proportional punishment over the offender, making sure They are really held accountable for their actions.

The Court regarded the case being maintainable under Article 184 (three) Because the Threat and encroachment alleged were such as to violate the constitutional right to life when interpreted expansively.

Civil Courts keep jurisdiction over title disputes in partition matters. Agreement to sell does not confer title; it involves legal transfer of title. Agreement to sell must be produced and properly exhibited in evidence. Declining relief based on an unproduced and un-exhibited sale agreement is legally unsustainable. Read more

This case is cited in a lot of subsequent judgments, particularly in cases involving constitutional legislation, judicial independence, as well as the rule of regulation.

Apart from the rules of procedure for precedent, the burden given to any reported judgment may perhaps depend on the reputation of both the reporter and the judges.[7]

Regardless of its popularity, very few could pay attention to its intricacies. This article is undoubtedly an attempt to highlight the flaws of this section as well as incredibly very low threshold that governs it.

Section 489-F of the Pakistan Penal Code pertains to offenses involving copyright currency website notes and coins. Its primary objective is to curb counterfeiting activities and maintain the sanctity of your national currency.

P.C. for grant of post arrest bail should also be dismissed. Suffice is to look at that that considerations for pre- arrest and post-arrest bail are completely different. Reliance in this regard is placed on case legislation titled as “Shah Nawaz v. The State” 2005 SCMR 1899” wherein it's been held via the august Supreme Court of Pakistan as under:--